|
 |
RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH WEEKLY #590
March 17, 1998
HEADLINES:
FROGS, ALLIGATORS AND PESTICIDES
Environmental Research Foundation P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403
Fax (410) 263-8944; Internet: erf@rachel.clark.net
Back issues available here or by E-mail; to get instructions, send
E-mail to INFO@rachel.clark.net with the single word HELP
in the message; back issues also available via ftp from
ftp.std.com/periodicals/rachel and from gopher.std.com.
and from http://www.monitor.net/rachel/
Subscribe: send E-mail to rachel-weekly-request@world.std.com
with the single word SUBSCRIBE in the message. It's free. |
 |
FROGS, ALLIGATORS AND PESTICIDES
Since 1993, scientists worldwide have been trying to understand
why frog populations are reported to be steeply declining in
relatively unspoiled environments on several continents. And
since 1995 scientists have been struggling to explain why
deformed frogs are being observed in large numbers in a broad
swath across the mid-northern region of the U.S.
In both cases, the first problem has been to determine whether
the observed changes represent natural fluctuations, or whether
they represent unusual events that might signal something
important about declining environmental quality. A consensus now
seems to be emerging:
- worldwide, many frog populations ARE declining to unusually
low levels (including, in some instances, extinction); and
- frog deformities are definitely occurring in unusually high
numbers in some locales.
Many factors have been identified as contributing to declines in
frog populations. They include:
- introduction of exotic predatory fish; stocked populations of
bass, for example, can clear a stream of all frog eggs and
tadpoles in short order.
- habitat destruction (draining wetlands, for example);
- landscape changes (clearing woods, building roads, etc.) that
isolate particular frog populations;
- increased ultraviolet radiation, caused by industrial
chemicals that have thinned the stratospheric ozone layer;
- clearing wild lands for agriculture;
- acid rain;
- humans eating frogs' legs;
- global warming, causing elevated temperatures and drought;
- pesticides;
The identified causes of deformed frogs include these:
- increased numbers of amphibian surveys, thus more and better
reporting;
- parasite infestations; a parasite called a trematode may be
involved in some frog deformities. Trematodes burrow into the
limb buds of tadpoles and can, in fact, cause at least one of the
deformities seen in Minnesota frogs.[1]
- toxic contamination (pesticides, heavy metals, acidification);
- predation (partially-successful predators may remove parts of
frogs, which may then grow back incorrectly);
- ultraviolet radiation;
- pesticides.,p>
As we review recent scientific literature and press reports of
scientific studies and meetings, what seems to stand out is a
growing awareness that industrial toxins --especially
agricultural biocides --are implicated in frog population
declines and in frog deformities.
FROGLOG is a publication of the Declining Amphibian Populations
Task Force of the World Conservation Union's Species Survival
Commission. In recent issues, FROGLOG has reported the following:
- The 1996 RED LIST OF THREATENED ANIMALS, published by the
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) lists 156
amphibian species as extinct, critical, endangered, or vulnerable
to extinction. This represents 25% of all the amphibians on
Earth.[2]
The Nature Conservancy, a U.S. organization, in 1996 surveyed the
status of 20,481 species of plants and animals in the U.S. and
reported that 37.9% of amphibians are in danger of becoming
extinct.[3]
- Researchers at Widener University in Chester, Pennsylvania,
and at Benedictine College in Atchison, Kansas, have shown that
acid rain can stress frog populations by harming their immune
systems.[4] Frogs raised in water with a pH of 5.5 had
significantly more bacteria in their spleens, and a significantly
higher death rate, than frogs raised in waters with a pH of 7.0.
The researchers attribute the increased numbers of bacteria to
reduced efficiency of bacteria removal by white blood cells
--part of the frogs' immune defenses.
- Researchers at the University of Windsor in Ontario, Canada,
have correlated high levels of organochlorine pesticides with
reduced frog populations in several parks and wildlife reserves
along the northern edge of Lake Erie.[5] At Point Pelee National
Park in Canada, only 5 frog species remain, and DDT residues in
these frogs average 5000 to 47,000 micrograms of DDT per kilogram
of body weight. At the Holiday Beach Conservation Area 40
kilometers [24 miles] east of Point Pelee, a dozen species of
frogs thrive and the DDT in their flesh averages only 6
micrograms per kilogram. This study doesn't prove that DDT has
killed off the frogs in Point Pelee, but it certainly points in
that direction.
- Researchers discovered numerous frogs and toads with missing
back legs in ponds and ditches exposed to pesticide runoff in the
St. Lawrence River valley in Quebec, Canada in 1992 and 1993.[6]
Of 854 individual amphibians (among 3 species of frogs and one
species of toad examined in 14 agricultural habitats), 106 (12%)
had hind limb malformations. The authors hypothesize that the
main cause of the deformities was exposure to pesticides. They
say that such leg deformities are "virtually unknown" among frogs
and toads in the wild.
- A population of leopard frogs (RANA PIPENS) exploded on a
western Michigan farm after the farm converted to organic
(pesticide-free) growing techniques. In 1988, a survey of the
farm had revealed that leopard frogs were nearly absent, but the
population rebounded quickly as soon as pesticide use ceased.[7]
Researchers reported that the number of different frog species on
the farm also increased after 1988.
- The Australian government in 1997 took an unprecedented
action, banning 84 herbicide products for use near water because
of their harmful effects on tadpoles and frogs.[8]
All of the 84 banned products contain Monsanto's glyphosate as
the active ingredient. However, the harmful component appears to
be not the glyphosate itself but an "inert" ingredient --a
detergent or wetting agent added to the herbicides so that
droplets of liquid spread out and cover the target leaves.
Detergents interfere with the ability of frogs to breathe through
their skin, and tadpoles to breathe through their gills. Michael
J. Tyler of the Department of Zoology at the University of
Adelaide, Australia, says, "Although the herbicide [glyphosate]
is claimed to be 'environmentally friendly,' it is clear that
users have been lulled into a false sense of security."
- Researchers in Sri Lanka report that frogs are nearly absent
from tea plantations where herbicides are heavily sprayed, but
their populations rebound shortly after spraying stops.[9]
"Conversion to organic [pesticide-free] tea production in this
region has contributed greatly to the re-establishment of
populations of local frogs," they say.
- According to the MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE, Swiss researchers
reported earlier this year that a fungicide used heavily in
Minnesota can stunt the growth of tadpoles and retard the sexual
development of frogs.[10] The Swiss researchers have not
produced the kinds of deformities seen in Minnesota frogs, but
they say the fungicide triphenyltin could harm frog populations
by delaying their growth, which would allow more time for
predators to eat them.
- Another class of industrial compounds called retinoids has
been implicated in frog deformities.[11] Retinoids are a class
of molecules including vitamin A and similar compounds, including
retinoic acid, which is a potent hormone. Exposure to excessive
amounts of retinoids can cause birth defects in all vertebrates,
from fish to humans. (The retinoid-based acne treatment Accutane
has caused birth defects in humans.) At least one pesticide,
methoprene, acts like a retinoid.[1] Methoprene is an insect
growth regulator that prevents young insects from maturing.
- Researchers some years ago identified a pesticide spill into
Lake Apopka as the cause of mature alligators with penises so
small that they could not reproduce. (See REHW #372, #377.)
Scientists assumed the trouble was confined to that one lake. But
recently alligator problems have come to light all across
southern Florida.[12] In the Everglades, which are contaminated
with numerous pesti-cides, full-grown alligators weigh hundreds
of pounds less than alligators elsewhere in Florida. And in Lake
Okeechobee, Florida's largest lake, juvenile alligators have
levels of reproductive hormones in their blood that are far below
normal --another possible sign of disruption by pesticides.
The case is not airtight. There is still much to be learned.
Nevertheless, evidence continues to accumulate indicating that
amphibians and reptiles are being harmed by industrial chemicals
released into the environment. Are humans exempt from similar
harm? It seems very unlikely.
--Peter Montague
(National Writers Union, UAW Local 1981/AFL-CIO) |
 |
| [1] Gee Chow, "Pesticides and the Mystery of Deformed Frogs,"
JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM Vol. 17, No. 3 (Fall 1997), pg. 14.
[2] Tim Halliday, "1996 IUCN Red List," Froglog No. 21 (March
1997), pg. 2. FROGLOG is edited by John W. Wilkinson, Department
of Biology, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7
6AA, United Kingdom. FROGLOG is available on the world wide web
at http://acs-info.open.ac.uk/info/newsletters/FROGLOG.html.
[3] William Dicke, "Numerous U.S. Plant and Freshwater Species
Found in Peril," NEW YORK TIMES January 2, 1996, pg. B12. The
Nature Conservancy can be reached in Arlington, Virginia: (703)
841-5300.
[4] Marc Brodkin and Martin Simon, "The Effects of Aquatic
Acidification on RANA PIPIENS," FROGLOG No. 20 (January 1997),
pg. 3.
[5] Ronald W. Russell and Stephen J. Hecnar, "The Ghosts of
Pesticides Past?" FROGLOG No. 19 (November 1996), pg. 1; a more
formal report is R.W. Russell and others, "Organochlorine
pesticide residues in southern Ontario spring peepers,"
ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY Vol. 14 (1995), pgs.
815-817. And see Ronald W. Russell and others, "Polychlorinated
Biphenyls and Chlorinated Pesticides in Southern Ontario, Canada,
Green Frogs," ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY Vol. 16, No.
11 (1997), pgs. 2258-2263.
[6] Martin Ouellet and others, "Hindlimb Deformities (Ectromelia,
Ectrodactyly) in Free-Living Anurans From Agricultural Habitats,"
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES Vol. 33, No. 1 (1997), pgs. 95-104.
[7] Patrick D. McKown and Samuel M. DeFazio, "Froglog Shorts,"
FROGLOG No. 21 (March 1997), pg. 4.
[8] Michael J. Tyler, "Herbicides Kill Frogs," FROGLOG No. 21
(March 1997), pg. 2.
[9] Ranil Senanayake and others, "Frog Tea?" FROGLOG No. 23
(August 1997), pg. 2.
[10] Greg Gordon, "Fungicide used by Minnesota farmers is found
to harm frogs," MINNEAPOLIS STAR TRIBUNE February 18, 1998, pg.
unknown.
[11] William Souder, "A Possible Leap Forward on Amphibian
Abnormalities," WASHINGTON POST March 16, 1998, pg. A3.
[12] Cable News Network (CNN), "Pesticides suspected in Florida
gator decline," CNN INTERACTIVE March 15, 1998. Available on the
world wide web at
http://www.cnn.com/EARTH/9803/15/gator.woes/index.html .
Descriptor terms: pesticides; frogs; alligators; mn; wi; fl;
species loss; wildlife; endocrine disruptors; wetlands; ozone
depletion; ultraviolet radiation; agriculture; global warming;
parasites; trematodes; heavy metals; mercury; lead; cadmium;
nature conservancy; red list of endangered animals; acid rain;
ddt; glyphosate; australia; herbicides; fungicides; inert
ingredients; triphenyltin; retinoids; retinoic acid; vitamin a;
accutane; methoprene; lake apopka; |
 |
NOTICE
Environmental Research Foundation provides this electronic
version of RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH WEEKLY free of charge
even though it costs our organization considerable time and money
to produce it. We would like to continue to provide this service
free. You could help by making a tax-deductible contribution
(anything you can afford, whether $5.00 or $500.00). Please send
your tax-deductible contribution to: Environmental Research
Foundation, P.O. Box 5036, Annapolis, MD 21403-7036. Please do
not send credit card information via E-mail. For further
information about making tax-deductible contributions to E.R.F.
by credit card please phone us toll free at 1-888-2RACHEL.
--Peter Montague, Editor
| |